The world’s most popular sporting event, the FIFA World Cup, is coming up in 4 years and a lot of people have their eyes on what will happen. Early signs are good for this year’s tournament as it has been reported that 64% of football fans would be interested in watching games with bitcoin using live stream betting platforms if they were available to them. As time goes by more countries could see blockchain-powered streams.
The “biennial world cup meaning” is a proposal that has been made by FIFA, football’s governing body. The proposal is to have the biennial World Cup every 4 years.
After national football officials were informed that switching to a biannual World Cup would generate an additional $4.4 billion in income for FIFA, president Gianni Infantino thinks he has majority support for his idea.
FIFA organized a “global summit” of national football federation officials to examine their plan to move the World Cup from every four years to every two years.
The financial data is part of a larger feasibility assessment, of which FIFA released a summary on Monday before releasing the entire 700-page report.
The positive results contrast sharply with the criticism leveled at the plans by detractors.
– Marcotti: FIFA’s idea is imperfect, but it would reduce inequality – ESPN+ viewer’s guide: LaLiga, Bundesliga, MLS, FA Cup, and more
European clubs, major leagues, and the European regulatory body UEFA have all expressed objection, with UEFA head Aleksander Ceferin threatening to boycott any future tournaments.
Although no vote on the issue has been set, Infantino said that a majority supported the idea, but that it needed to be addressed as part of a larger reform of the international match calendar.
“If I were to hold a ballot tomorrow, I believe the majority would vote in favor of a World Cup every two years,” Infantino said following the session.
“But that is not the subject; we are looking at the whole calendar to see how we can improve football and how many people we can get on board with a new method of organizing football’s future,” he continued.
Infantino refused to say when a vote would take place or if it would be on the agenda at the FIFA congress on March 31 in Doha.
“At the end of the day, it’s about making the best choices for football, and we’ll take our time to reach that conclusion. At the conference, I will not make any commitments. Everything is accessible and adaptable “he said
“We will continue the debate and analysis in the hopes of making progress, one way or the other, or in some medium ground,” he added.
CONCACAF president Victor Montagliani, who leads the organization representing North, Central, and South America and the Caribbean, has proposed a compromise option.
Montagliani told Reuters earlier this month that instead of a complete World Cup with a separate qualification procedure, an extra event might be a redesigned version of the old Confederations Cup.
According to a World Leagues Forum analysis released last month, the FIFA plan, together with modifications to the Club World Cup, could cost the major domestic soccer leagues and UEFA roughly €8 billion every season in lost TV rights, match-day and commercial deals.
On Friday, UEFA released a research from consultant firm Oliver & Ohlbaum warning that changes to the international schedule will result in income for European national federations falling by between €2.5 billion and €3 billion over a four-year cycle.
The attendees at Monday’s meeting were informed that a research by the Italian firm Open Economics indicated that national team and international club tournaments had little impact on local league and UEFA competition earnings.
Gab and Juls weigh in on the benefits and drawbacks of more frequent World Cups in men’s and women’s sports.
According to a Nielsen research, the biennial World Cup plan’s profits would climb from a projected US$7 billion — for a 48-team event — to US$11.4 billion over a four-year cycle due to higher ticket collections, TV rights, and sponsorship income.
FIFA officials informed the delegates that US$3.5 billion of the extra money will go to a new “Member Association Solidarity Fund,” with each national federation receiving about US$16 million over four years, as well as additional funding for the FIFA Forward Program for development initiatives.
The cash, according to FIFA, would assist bridge the income gap between established and developing football markets.
CONMEBOL, the South American confederation, has joined UEFA in opposing the plan.
FIFA’s Director of Global Football Development, Arsene Wenger, expressed optimism that the conversation will alter in the coming weeks.
“We confront resistance, but I lament that 90 percent of it is based on emotion rather than facts or analysis. We must overcome our fear since fear underpins the majority of our emotions “he said
Watch This Video-
The “world cup 2 years proposal” is a plan that has been proposed by FIFA. The plan would see the World Cup take place every two years instead of four.
- world cup every two years
- world cup qualifiers
- fifa world cup proposal
- fifa changing world cup
- 2022 fifa world cup